Lowered wing angles between will also help. Yeongam requires low wing angles and ride heights, a fast throttle map and small brake pads in order to navigate its huge landscape. Tweaking the alignment will help also, as will stiffening the suspension springs setting them to around , giving you the necessary fidelity when braking hard into turns.
Suspension settings similar to 2,2,7,8 coupled with aerodynamics of 3,4 are the only major changes needed for the quick Brazilian circuit. For further improvement, changing the ballast distribution to favour the front end should work , while making the brake pads small and pressure high could also quicken your best time.
A guide to tweaking your car in F1 Each track comes with a different set of parameters and setup options. This guide lists the key points and settings for each track in the race calendar.
I think we know why McLaren couldnt maximise their package which was claimed and backed up with evidence to be the 2nd fastest. Gill 14th December , IN ur view Mclaren was the fastest car and it had all the poles and fastest laps and race wins coz ur name says so. Apart from some trouble for Hamilton, like the wheel rim failure in Spain, and Hungary gearbox issues? A crazy crazy thing about graph 1 are the Hungary data.
Or, more to the point, what happened afterward. Hungary emphasizes downforce, but so do Spain, Monaco, Singapore, and others. How did Ferrari and McLaren suddenly go to 1. That wing was literally dragging on the ground in Hungary. Those images stopped after Hungary.
This means that they maximise the potential of their car, perhaps even getting race wins, whilst the others play it safe. Madman 13th December , That RBR nearly lost both titles, with that car, is amazing. The RBR must have been one of the best cars in F1 history, relative to the opposition.
People heap praise on Vettel for winning the title. BrownyNSW 13th December , Great article again Keith, you might be working on it already but I would like to see a statisical review of team-mate comparisions for Would be interesting to see the data. These observations, like the McLaren claims, are interesting to look at. So a lap-time may suggest that car X is better than car Y; but it might just be that driver A in car X is better than driver Y in car B; but that car Y is better than car X.
This is especially so when the gap between times of different drivers in different cars is so close, as it sometimes was last season. It should be obvious that Ferrari had a better car than McLaren.
It was clear in the first race and in the last. The Ferrari had better overall downforce and accepted updates much better. McLaren, once more, had the third best car, poor strategy and pitstops on the whole, not great reliability, etc. However, they did have the best drivers. That was their only saving grace. The simple fact, though, is that for him to be in contention for the title in the last race, with the third best car, means that he must have made very few mistakes compared with the three drivers against whom he was competing but in far better cars.
Lewis made one mistake all year: monza. Because his car, etc. Whereas, Vettel and Alonso, who had much better cars, were able to make half a dozen mistakes and still finish ahead. Besides, we know how Alonso and Lewis compare in equal machinery: if Alonso is ahead, he has a better car. I think this debate of the 2nd placed car is pointless.
One must only look at what Mclaren themselves said. That should settle the debate. But one problem is that not only race conditions count — and qualy is where Button lagged the most behind Hamilton — averaging those as well might still have worked out for McLaren, but then only because Massa fell back so far in the 2nd half of the season. As I also said above, Button was much closer on race pace, so yes, I can believe the McLaren team beat the Ferrari on track, if not in the pit stops ….
The F10 seemed much more conservative, but that did allow them seemingly better adaptability to new things. Ferrari managed needed? Arrogance or inflexibility — eventually they changed their F-duct after inspiration from Renault etc. I think McLaren were outdeveloped. Dev 14th December , Tassilo Stiebe 14th December , Hamilton overcame an inferior car with poorer reliability and greater misfortune to stay in the title hunt to the very end.
A M amam 3rd December , So Hamilton challenged all the way in the 3rd fastest car. Skip to content. Overall, then, this means our car was 0. A low ride height on your suspension is also useful 2,2.
Lowering the camber Lowering the gearbox settings for each gear will help, given the tight corners of the circuit. A fast throttle map will improve acceleration after these arduous and slow turns. Lowering the suspension ride height 1,3 while upping the gearbox speeds for the quicker parts of the track. Camber alignment should be the lowest possible Hero 7 Jun, am. You switched up all the labels. All the Wet setups are the Dry ones and vice versa.
Very good and stable setups. Nice job. Share to your Steam activity feed. You need to sign in or create an account to do that. Sign In Create an Account Cancel.
All rights reserved.
0コメント