It increases your caster level only, which would help you penetrate spell resistance and increase the duration and other effects of your spells. You may select this feat multiple times. Each time you choose it, you must apply it to a different spellcasting class. Prestige Classes. It's shame we don't have it yet in DDO. For the record, it only increases your caster level.
It doesn't give you more SPs, more spell slots, higher level spells, or anything else. All it does is make it like you were up to 4 levels higher for the purposes of determine the variable effects of your spells. Have a question about the Eberron Setting? Ask a Loremaster.
My vote They absolutely should add this feat in then. Personally I don't see why you can't be allowed to have a lvl 14 for caster lvl , spell penetration, and saves, while keeping the lvl 7 dice effects like damage.
I would be just fine casting 7d5 dice fireballs if they had a chance to hit as if i were a lvl 14 caster. Originally Posted by HeroGuild. They absolutely should add this feat in then. Former Xoriat-er. Embrace the Madness.
One vote against If any feat is a "must have" for a particular character type short of, of course, prerequisite feats , then that feat imho is probably overpowered. I'm not saying it would be impossible to be helpful I'm sure that toon would be awesome at doing other things though! There is also the issue about whether it will work for Paladin and Ranger levels.
Originally Posted by fatherpirate. I don't really see a feat that gives a ftr 4 free melee attack levels.. I don't see a feat giving a caster the same thing This is a good idea. Folks, spell casting lvl must be handled carefully a single extra lvl is equal to more damage.. That feat would make a 1st lvl Wizard a 5th lvl Wizard and if he is human he could take empower as well.. This idea belongs in the pile with removing all armor penalties to dex so rogues can use full plate giving Pal.
When this game is gone, I will not cry a single tear. It is just part of the circle of life. It wont put you over your character level. With a very small sp pool to boot. It's nothing that game breaking. Shadowsteel [TR train wreck]. Fatherpirate, you might need to read up on the source material of what makes the practiced spellcaster feat. You don't get feats or any other benefits of the higher caster level, simply the spell penetration, spell length and damage dice. Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Last Jump to page:.
All times are GMT It simply makes multi-classed spellcasters playable at higher levels, instead of underpowered. Psi SeveredHead Adventurer. I'd love to know what this feat is doing in a game where the Eldritch Knight can be found in a core book. This takes away most of the only real disadvantage of being an eldritch knight. Did they think it was too weak? Wasn't that something that should have been discovered when they playtested the eldritch knight?
Ourph First Post. Hypersmurf said:. It only provides a benefit to a character who is otherwise weak. Liquidsabre Explorer. Ourph said:. If the goal is to take away the drawbacks to multi-classing, let's at least be thorough. FireLance Legend. Most multiclass casters I've seen use their spellcasting abilities to enhance the abilities of their primary class, NOT as direct attacks.
Used that way, their spell abilities are exactly where they should be. The one level sorcerer casting Mage Armor and Shield is a good example. Guess what? It's supposed to be a trade-off. Any multiclass caster who expects to be performing just as well or nearly as well as a single class caster in straight up spell combat vs.
Darklone Registered User. Psi SeveredHead said:. Thanee First Post. Darklone said:. One last time, I do not feel that not having access to the higher level spells is a penalty to a multiclassed character Vrecknidj Explorer. And, there is no such similar "stackability" for spells per day, known, or caster level.
Since so much rides on caster level for spellcasters, there should be a similar progression system. But, there might be a way to house-rule this so that feats and prestige classes aren't required. In the campaigns I run, there are far fewer PC spellcasters than there were in 2e or 1e.
0コメント